Welcome, folks, to another installment of “Mike Rogers Can’t Stop Lying,” brought to you by Michigan’s ongoing Senate race!

Last night’s debate between Elissa Slotkin and Mike Rogers was a perfect case study in political deception versus actual leadership. Rogers, who seems more interested in spinning tales than addressing reality, wasted no time launching into his usual script: manufacturing jobs are disappearing, Michigan is floundering, and the sky is falling. Except, it’s not. Rogers painted a grim picture of Michigan's job market, claiming the state had lost a ton of manufacturing jobs. What he failed to mention (maybe because it’s true) is that Michigan’s unemployment rate is actually at a 20-year low. Yes, Rogers, the truth is awkward sometimes, but facts are facts.

While Rogers was busy concocting his narrative of doom, Slotkin came armed with, you know, actual plans. She talked about her policies to bring manufacturing jobs back to Michigan—not just for nostalgia’s sake, but because she’s got a strategy. Slotkin’s focus? Lowering costs for middle-class families. She’s pushing to reduce housing and healthcare costs, and expand tax credits for working people. Actual solutions, people! Not finger-pointing.

Next up, Social Security and Medicare—two programs Republicans seem to talk about with all the energy of someone reading you the Terms & Conditions for a phone update. Rogers didn’t really offer much, probably because his actual record on these issues isn’t exactly a selling point. Slotkin didn’t let him off the hook. She called him out on his track record—voting to raise the retirement age, privatize Social Security, and, cherry on top, voting against lowering prescription drug costs. When it comes to protecting seniors, Rogers isn’t exactly the knight in shining armor—he’s more like the guy who wants to steal your armor and sell it for parts.

Then there was the classic, "Throw a debunked lie at Slotkin and hope it sticks." Rogers accused her of signing a nondisclosure agreement with a Chinese company. Slotkin? Calm, cool, collected—she’s had to swat this lie down before, and last night was no different. Meanwhile, Rogers conveniently left out that he, himself, worked with companies investing in China to fatten his own pockets. Projection much, Mike?

And finally, the reproductive rights showdown. When pressed on abortion, Rogers did the typical MAGA two-step, throwing the decision “to the states.” Translation: I know my extreme views on this are unpopular, so here’s a vague, safe-sounding answer. But Slotkin wasn’t having it. She made it clear that Rogers has a 100% record for voting in favor of every single ban and restriction on abortion. Fifty-six times, people. Fifty-six times he voted to tell women, "We don’t trust you to make your own decisions." Rogers didn’t even bother voting on Prop 3, which codified the right to choose in Michigan’s constitution. Why? Because he was living it up in Florida at the time. Slotkin was here, she voted, and she made sure Michigan women could keep their rights.

So, there you have it: Rogers gave us a bunch of lies and dodges, while Slotkin delivered substance and receipts. Michigan deserves a Senator who isn’t afraid of the truth, and Slotkin showed she’s ready to step up. Rogers, on the other hand? Maybe he should spend a little less time in Florida and a little more time learning about what’s really going on in the state he wants to represent.

Just when you thought Trump couldn’t get any more out of touch, he hops on Truth Social to drop a fresh load of BS. In his latest attempt to gaslight half the population, Trump claimed in a August 23rd Truth Social Post that his administration would be "great for women and their reproductive rights." Yeah, you read that right. The guy who’s been gunning for women’s rights like it’s a sport is now pretending to be our best friend. Nice try, Donny, but we’re not falling for it.

But because one ridiculous post isn’t enough, he doubled down with another gem on the same day: "The Republican Party is charging forward on many fronts, and I am very proud that we are a leader on IVF." Seriously? Is this the same Republican Party that’s been busy dismantling reproductive rights at every turn? The same party where every single Michigan House Republicans—his own people—voted against a nine bill package protecting IVF in the state? Or let’s talk about his buddy Mike Rogers, the Michigan GOP Senate candidate who, during his 14 years in Congress, pushed for four different bills that would have outlawed IVF altogether. The mental gymnastics here are Olympic-level, folks.

But let’s get real. Trump must think we’re idiots if he believes we’re going to forget who he really is. This is the same guy who bragged about overturning Roe v. Wade—a move that yanked control over our own bodies out of our hands. The same guy who’s been spewing sexist trash for decades, from his infamous “grab ‘em by the pussy” comment to his endless stream of insults aimed at women who dared to stand up to him.

Let’s be clear: Trump isn’t a champion for women. He’s the guy who’s been dragging us backward every chance he gets. And now he expects us to buy this crap about how he’s all about protecting our reproductive rights? Please. It’s like Dracula offering to guard the blood bank.

The truth is, Trump’s just trying to rewrite history, hoping we’ve forgotten all the ways he’s screwed us over. But guess what? We haven’t forgotten, and we’re not about to start now. We see right through his lies, and we’re not stupid enough to let him get away with it.

Women across the country are done with Trump’s BS. We’re done with being talked down to, lied to, and treated like we don’t have a clue. We’re not going to be fooled by some half-baked attempt to make us think he’s suddenly on our side. The man’s been bad news for women since day one, and no amount of Truth Social posts is going to change that.

So, Trump, if you think we’re going to fall for this, you’re dead wrong. We’re smarter than you give us credit for, and we’re not about to let you or your party keep playing games with our rights. We’re done listening to your lies. We’re done with the gaslighting. And we’re sure as hell done with you.

Opinion

It’s time we faced the brutal truth: the corporate media is failing us. The discrepancy in how they report on Donald Trump versus Joe Biden is not just glaringly obvious; it’s downright dangerous.

Consider this: Joe Biden flubs a debate performance, and the media vultures circle, calling for his resignation. Yet, Donald Trump, adjudicated rapist and felon, skates by without a peep demanding he step down. This isn't just a double standard; it's a scandal. The billionaire owned corporate media’s failure to call out Trump’s heinous actions with the same intensity they reserve for Biden’s minor missteps is nothing short of journalistic malpractice. It's almost like it doesn't fit their agenda.

Let’s talk about Project 2025. This initiative threatens to dismantle the very structure of our democracy, yet it barely makes a blip on the media’s radar. Why? The corporate media would rather chase after trivial headlines than tackle the stories that truly matter, like the looming threat to our democratic institutions. A few days ago the New York Times published a piece titled. " Why I Don't Vote, And Why Maybe You Shouldn't Either. The author, Hillsdale College grad Matthew Walther does in fact vote. A quick check that required under 5 minutes of our time confirmed he voted in 2020 and 2022. A few months ago the same paper published an article titled, "Trump Respects Women, Most Men Say. " We cancelled our subscription after that one.

Then there's the New York Post’s recent despicable article suggesting Kamala Harris could become the first "DEI president." This overtly racist commentary was allowed to stand with minimal backlash. Meanwhile, the same media hounds Biden for every gaffe and stumble. The double standard is not just hypocritical; it’s toxic. By giving a platform to such racist drivel, the media is complicit in perpetuating dangerous stereotypes.

The most egregious failure, however, is the media’s near-silence on the Epstein documents. These documents reveal Trump’s involvement in vile acts of sexual misconduct, forcing young girls to perform sex acts while he watched. This should be front-page news, yet it’s buried beneath layers of inconsequential coverage. The media’s reluctance to hammer Trump with the same vigor they use against Biden is a damning indictment of their priorities.

This isn’t just about journalistic bias; it’s about the corporate media’s abdication of their responsibility to the public. They’re more interested in clickbait and advertising dollars than in holding the powerful accountable. Their selective outrage and skewed reporting are eroding trust in the press and, by extension, in our democratic processes.

We’re sick of it. We’re tired of a media landscape that lets a perverted degenerate like Trump off the hook while crucifying Biden for simply being old. Trump is old too and he is a rapist and a racist. We'd like to see him try to ride a bike. We digress though. This isn’t just unfair; it’s dangerous. Democracy cannot survive without a free and fair press, and right now, we don’t have one.

A bright spot.. Fortunately, here in Michigan, we are blessed with some stellar local reporting. Our local journalists are tenacious, thorough, and committed to uncovering the truth. We suggest following them individually online. While the billionaire owned corporate media flounders, Michigan’s reporters are holding the powerful to account and delivering the news that truly matters. We should be turning to these local sources for our information, supporting the journalists who are doing the work that the corporate media has abandoned.

Enough is enough. The latest scandal involving Rep. Neil Friske is just another sickening chapter in the ongoing saga of right-wing politicians' rampant disrespect and violence against women. Friske, recently released from jail, faces potential felony charges of sexual assault, assault, and a weapons charge after a night at a strip club turned into a horrifying altercation with an employee, culminating in him brandishing a weapon on her at another location around 3 AM Friday morning. This is beyond disgraceful; it's infuriating.

How many times do we have to hear about yet another Republican figure embroiled in scandalous, criminal behavior towards women? Earlier this year, we learned the Michigan House Republican Minority Leader Matt Hall had been under investigation for assault after his girlfriend called 911 on him. And let's not forget the grotesque high-profile case of the Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump being convicted in civil court of rape. The culture of violence against women within the GOP is not just a series of isolated incidents; it is a systemic issue that reveals their true, vile nature.

The former MI GOP Republican House Leader Lee Chatfield was credibly accused by his sister-in-law of rape and sexual abuse starting when she was a teenager at a school he worked at—his father, the principal, perpetuating a cycle of silence and abuse. And then there's Republican Rep. Bob Bezotte, whose wife of 50 years filed for divorce, citing years of mental, emotional, and physical abuse.

This pattern of behavior isn't just coincidence; it’s a damning indictment of the GOP’s toxic, misogynistic culture. What's worse, fellow Republicans consistently fail to hold their own accountable, allowing this dangerous culture to fester unchecked.

This is the party that wants to strip women of their rights, control their bodies, and reduce them to second-class citizens. They fight against our autonomy, from blocking access to healthcare and birth control to undermining our right to vote and divorce. They are not champions of freedom and family values; they are oppressors who perpetuate harm and silence victims.

Women, it's time to stand up and say no more. We cannot afford to support politicians who treat us as anything less than equals. We must refuse to vote for men who believe they have the right to dominate and control us. This is a call to action—demand accountability, demand respect, and demand a political landscape where violence against women is not tolerated, but eradicated. It's time to end the culture of abuse in the GOP and fight for a future where women's rights are non-negotiable and our safety is a given.

Ladies and gentlemen, gather 'round for a tale of political leadership that seems ripped straight from the plot of a B-grade soap opera. This week's protagonist? None other than Matt Hall, the leader of the Michigan House Republicans, who, according to a jaw-dropping report from Rolling Stone, allegedly spent a mind-boggling $73,000 on gambling in just one month. Yes, you heard that right—$73,000!

The High Stakes

According to the Rolling Stone exposé, Matt Hall has potentially taken "high stakes" to an entirely new level, draining more cash in a month than most Michiganders make in a year. And all this while sitting in a position of significant political power. It's like discovering your dentist moonlights as the Tooth Fairy—absolutely bonkers and deeply concerning.

House of Cards

Now, let's dissect why this is a colossal problem. Hall isn’t just any run-of-the-mill politician; he’s the leader of the Michigan House Republicans. This means he’s the guy steering the ship, supposedly navigating through the choppy waters of Michigan politics with a steady hand. But how steady can that hand be when it’s constantly being dealt losing cards at the blackjack table?

To make matters worse, the Michigan House Republicans have been a hotbed of scandal this year. From racist tweets and political theater to idiotic sleep-ins where one member bizarrely agreed that the plot of E.T. was happening to push an anti immigration agenda, it’s been a circus. Yet, Hall has shown an astonishing level of apathy towards these issues. He refuses to comment or publicly admonish his caucus for their stupid, racist antics. It's as if he could care less about the constant trouble they get into, or at least that’s the impression he gives.

Leadership in Question

This is not his first high-profile scanda for Hall himself. It was uncovered that his partner called 911 for on him during a gambling trip in 2019 while serving in the Michigan House and prior to that, it was reported that he sent racist death threats to a former girlfriend's friend. Hall’s role as the House Republican Leader means he is at the forefront of policy-making and legislative strategies for the GOP in Michigan. His ability to lead and make sound decisions is now under scrutiny. Can a leader with such significant personal issues be trusted to prioritize the needs of his constituents and the state over his own impulses?

Public Trust on the Line

Here’s a wild concept: politicians are supposed to be trustworthy. They’re elected to serve the public interest, not to fritter away their money (or worse, potentially taxpayer money) on high-risk gambles. Hall’s alleged actions are a slap in the face to every Michigander who expects their leaders to exhibit a modicum of self-control and responsibility.

The Republican Party's Dilemma

The Michigan GOP now finds itself in a precarious position. With their leader’s credibility in tatters, they must decide whether to stand by him or cut their losses. He has already faced one call from his own party to step down. Continuing to support Hall could alienate voters and erode public trust even further.

The Bigger Picture

This scandal isn’t just about one man's gambling problem, racist history or past abuse allegation. It’s about the broader issue of accountability and transparency in politics. How many other leaders might be hiding similar skeletons in their closets? And what does it say about our political system that such behavior can go unchecked until it reaches such a scandalous scale? It’s worth noting that Hall’s predecessor, Lee Chatfield, was indicted and committed crimes while in office. This isn't just an isolated incident but a pattern of problematic leadership within the Michigan House Republicans.

Conclusion: A Call for Accountability

The saga of Matt Hall is a stark reminder of the importance of ethical leadership. The Michigan House Republicans have a duty to their constituents to address this issue head-on. It’s time to stop gambling with public trust and start holding our leaders accountable. If they don’t, they might find that the biggest gamble of all is the one they’re taking with their own political futures.

So, Matt Hall, here’s a piece of advice: maybe it’s time to fold ‘em and step away from the table before you lose more than just your money. The stakes are too high, and Michigan deserves better.

Senator Katie Britt of Alabama, who previously caught public attention for her weird overacting on a televised rebuttal to President Biden's State of the Union address, has now introduced a deeply troubling piece of legislation—the More Opportunities for Moms to Succeed Act (MOMS Act). This act, which proposes the creation of a federal website called Pregnancy.gov, is a dangerous overreach into the personal lives of pregnant individuals, setting a precedent for unacceptable levels of surveillance and control under the guise of support.

The premise of Pregnancy.gov, according to Senator Britt, is to serve as a clearinghouse for resources for pregnant and postpartum women, as well as those parenting young children. However, the proposed mechanism—to collect personal information through a series of questions and allow government officials to follow up for more details—smacks of a dystopian surveillance tool rather than a benevolent resource platform. This invasive approach is not only a gross violation of privacy but also opens the door to potential misuse of sensitive data.

Even more insidious is the act’s directive to connect users to so-called “crisis pregnancy centers.” These centers are infamous for their unethical practices, often providing misleading or outright false information to dissuade individuals from considering abortion. By officially routing vulnerable women to these deceptive organizations, Pregnancy.gov would be complicit in a systemic misinformation campaign, dressed up as government-endorsed healthcare guidance.

This legislation represents a horrifying step towards a society where the reproductive decisions of individuals are monitored and manipulated by the state. It is an affront to the principles of privacy and autonomy that should be at the heart of a democratic society. The idea that a federal database should track and intervene in the personal healthcare decisions of women is not only paternalistic but also dangerously authoritarian.

Critics of the MOMS Act must recognize the broader implications of such a database. It is not merely an overstep but a potential tool for control and oppression, reminiscent of darker times and regimes where personal freedoms were curtailed in the name of public good. The healthcare of pregnant individuals should be guided by medical professionals and personal choice, not by government officials with ulterior motives.

Senator Britt’s bill, therefore, should not be seen as an attempt at supporting mothers but as what it truly is—a disgraceful and nefarious attempt to surveil and control women under the veneer of assistance and resource provision. As constituents and advocates for civil liberties, we must vehemently oppose the MOMS Act and any similar efforts that threaten our fundamental rights and dignities.

Michigan's political scene lately feels more like a poorly scripted reality TV show, and at the center of this are MAGA leaders like House Minority Leader Matt Hall (R) and Tudor Dixon. Their recent speeches at a Trump rally in Freeland were, to put it mildly, a dumpster fire inside a train wreck during a clown show. They were chosen to speak at Trump's campaign rally so we can see that these are the voices and the narrative that the state's party wants to platform this election cycle.

Let’s start with Matt Hall, who seems to think that the best way to do politics is by playing fast and loose with the truth. Hall skipped out on actually legislating yesterday, he missed votes in the MI House, one that would address the paramedic shortage, to give a xenophobic speech at a Trump rally to fuel unwarranted fears against immigrants. And remember his claim about Governor Whitmer giving rent subsidies to asylum seekers? Yes, that gem that has been debunked many times, and yet, here he is, doubling down like a conspiracy theorist at a UFO convention. Keep in mind Hall and his caucus members too many to count racism scandals occurred while he was demanding Michigan's first Black House Speaker give up his power to Hall who once said, "The South will rise again.." and has had his current girlfriend call 911 on him. We digress..

Not to be outdone, Tudor Dixon took the stage with what can only be described as a masterclass in how to achieve rock bottom in political decorum. Dixon decided that a baseless and frankly disgusting accusation against Governor Whitmer was her go-to move. Her claim? Suggesting a scandalous affair with the disgraced former Republican House Speaker, Lee Chatfield.

"I don't know if you saw the latest video where [Whitmer] talks about nicknames," said Dixon. "She has a bunch of different nicknames. She left one out, did you notice that? You know the nickname I'm talking about? Stretchen Gretchen. Just between us girls, when you’re campaigning, you hear a lot of stuff you normally wouldn't hear, and one of our legislators told me that Lee Chatfield was pretty familiar with that name. I guess I can't accuse her of not being bipartisan anymore, huh?"

Chatfield was recently charged with financial crimes and has had his sister in law accuse him of raping her while she was at a christian school that his father was principal at. Other family members have corroborated.

These speeches aren't just bad politics; they're an all-out assault on the concept of reasoned discourse and truthfulness. It's as if Hall and Dixon are trying to compete for the "Who Can Dive Lower?" award in the Olympic pool of political decency.

What Michigan needs—and deserves—is leaders who can actually lead, not those who spread misinformation and stoop to personal attacks that would make school bullies cringe. The residents of Michigan should demand better because leadership should lift up communities with inspiration and integrity, not drag them down into the mud for political points.

At the end of the day, it's clear that Hall and Dixon's approach to politics isn't just ineffective—it's corrosively divisive. The people of Michigan must ask themselves whether these are the kinds of leaders they want shaping their state's future. Of course, none of this should be surprising in a political climate where their dear leader, Donald Trump, set the gold standard for falsehoods and scandal. This is a man whose presidency was a relentless exhibition of dishonesty and fraud. Hall and Dixon are just following the trail blazed by Trump, where deceit is a strategy and decency isn't even a consideration.

Welcome to Michigan, where the "pro-life" rhetoric of House Republicans crashes spectacularly against the rocky shores of reality. Recently, Governor Gretchen Whitmer recently signed a bill to overturn the nation’s only ban on paid surrogacy agreements and to bolster protections for IVF families—including those in the LGBTQ+ community. She called these reforms "commonsense, long overdue changes." Yet, despite the apparent benefits of such progressive measures, every single Michigan House Republican decided to turn a cold shoulder.

Why does this matter? It highlights a staggering level of hypocrisy among a group that loudly trumpets their devotion to "pro-life" and "pro-family" values while actively voting against measures designed to help people actually start families. Let’s dive into this cauldron of contradictions and expose just how out of touch these so-called family advocates really are.

Michigan was an outlier with its archaic ban on surrogacy, a restriction that seemed more at home in a dystopian novel than in the law books of a democratic state. This ban not only limited family-building options but also flew in the face of what it means to support life and family in all its forms.

The bill's journey through the legislature was a stark display of partisan politics. While it did manage to snag a couple of Republican votes in the Senate, the main bill faced a complete shutdown from the House Republicans. This unanimous decision against the bill by the GOP members contrasts sharply with their self-professed mantra of being "pro-life" and "pro-family." How can one claim to champion family values yet oppose a bill that directly supports diverse family structures and provides more individuals the joy of parenthood?

The Dems legislation ensures robust protections for all parties involved in surrogacy. The requirements include being at least 21 years old, undergoing thorough medical and mental health consultations, and securing independent legal representation. These stipulations are designed to safeguard the interests and well-being of the surrogate carriers—hardly the actions of a government looking to exploit its citizens, but rather the measures of one striving to protect them.

So, why the opposition? It appears to be a mix of outdated ideologies and a refusal to recognize the evolving nature of family and parenthood. By voting against such a bill, the Michigan GOP has showcased a glaring hypocrisy: proclaiming to uphold life while simultaneously hindering the formation of families in a safe, legal, and ethical manner.

Critics of the bill argue various points, but none hold water when scrutinized. The opposition seems rooted less in concern for ethical complexities and more in a desire to maintain a status quo that no longer serves the public interest. In doing so, they expose themselves not just as anti-progressive but as fundamentally anti-family, at least in any modern, inclusive sense of the word.

Real support for life extends beyond the womb and includes supporting viable, diverse, and ethical avenues for family formation, but also ensuring that both the child and mother receive the necessary care and support after birth. It encompasses a commitment to providing healthcare, education, and economic assistance that can help families thrive. This holistic approach affirms the value of life at all stages and promotes a supportive environment for mother and child alike. As it stands the MAGAs position is pro-life in name only, a slogan worn like a badge but not honored in legislative practice. It’s time they reassess what it truly means to be pro-family, or perhaps more accurately, it’s time for voters to reassess them.

This past week marked the kick-off of a landmark event in American history: the first criminal trial of a former U.S. President, Donald Trump. Held in Manhattan Criminal Court, this spectacle drew nearly 300 prospective jurors, a gaggle of media, and a significant cloud of controversy—both metaphorical and literal.

As the court set about the arduous task of selecting a jury, the man at the center of it all seemed to find the proceedings less than riveting. Trump’s naps became a noticeable theme, with observers remarking that his eyes closed and his head would dropped down. This happened at least twice.

However, it wasn’t just the sleepiness that caught the attention of those present; it was also the, shall we say, aromatic ambiance that began to permeate the courtroom. Meidas Touch reports "Donald trump is actually farting in the court and that is is very stinky around him. It is a putrid odor in the courtroom and that trumps lawyers are repulsed by the scent and smell…. as he is falling asleep he is passing gas and his lawyers are really struggling with the smell."

Amidst this rather un-presidential scene inside, the world outside the court wasn't devoid of drama either. The jury’s selection was almost upstaged by a bizarre and tragic incident involving a conspiracy theorist who set himself on fire outside the courthouse. This fiery display provided a stark, if unsettling, counterpoint to the internal emissions of the trial.

Trump himself has lambasted the proceedings, decrying them as "election interference" aimed at derailing his 2024 presidential aspirations. Facing 34 felony counts for allegedly falsifying business records to sway the 2016 election, his defensive strategy is as much about combating public perception as it is about legal acumen.

As we wrap up this tumultuous first week, one thing is clear: this trial is more than a legal proceeding; it's a test of how much air (fresh or otherwise) one courtroom can hold. Stay tuned as we continue to cover the gasps, gaffes, and gases of this unprecedented event. It's sure to be a breath of fresh… well, something.

The Police Association of Michigan's endorsement of Donald Trump for president is an absolute disgrace. Trump, a man saddled with 88 felony indictments, found guilty of rape in a civil trial, and responsible for inciting an insurrection that resulted in the death of a Capitol police officer and injuries to dozens more, is the antithesis of what law enforcement should represent.

It’s baffling and deeply concerning that a body meant to uphold the highest standards of law and order would support someone whose actions have so blatantly undermined those very principles. Trump’s track record is not just a political liability; it’s a catalogue of actions that flirt dangerously with outright criminality.

By endorsing Trump, the Police Association of Michigan betrays not only the public trust but also the fundamental duties of police officers to serve and protect with integrity. This endorsement will erode crucial community trust and respect for police at a time when both are sorely needed. It sends a chilling message that law enforcement backs power over principle, and lawlessness over justice.

This is a sad day for those who respect the rule of law in Michigan. The association should be ashamed, and the public rightly outraged, that law enforcement would endorse a figure so contrary to the values they are sworn to uphold. This decision must be condemned by all who believe in the integrity of policing and the importance of moral leadership within our law enforcement institutions.